Showing posts with label 2014 Topps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2014 Topps. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Final thoughts on 2014 (plus a Tis the Season update)

Before I get all cranky, let me get the update out first. I have started shipping, so if you are in any of these zip codes: 68702, 60060, 49001, 17402, 85255, 91320, 46561, 63303 or 12967, you should be getting something this week. I hope to make another group of shipments tomorrow (maybe). So there.

Ok - I purchased some 2014 flagship so I can rightfully bash the product. I figure if you buy it, you can complain about it. So let's talk about all I think is wrong with the release, plus the one thing I think they got right. Yup - I said "right". You give props when it's earned.


1) design and cropping

Plenty have said that the 2014 design looks like Bowman. I'll agree with that statement. However, when you combine really poor cropping with a design that is misweighted, it's a disaster. For some reason, Topps used a zoom lens on most of the pictures. And then, with whomever is in the room laying out the cards, the drive was to have the player's face centered left/right on a great majority of the cards. In that, you can see in the scanned cards above how that places the images of the players incorrectly within the frame. The Ramirez and the Melky are both too far right, and with the stupid team name side box, the cards are really heavy to the right. The Guthrie has the same poor framing, however this card is less of an issue with the bleed out of frame to the left. The name sort of balances the image, but in actuality, it doesn't in my opinion. Most of the horizontal cards work well within the frame, but that team name is a real bother.


2. more colors

What - blue and red were not enough, along with the black, cammo, platinum, silver, blah, blah, blah...? This is a money grab for those that like to build rainbows. Also - yellow and green? Why not a couple worse colors like burnt umber and smurple?

Smurple FTW.



3. red sparkle

Silver worked. Gold worked. Green worked. Red does not.


4. Inserts

I'll talk about a couple of the inserts. This one is famous for the really pathetic pithy sayings above the player's name. If you are unsure, just read this.


Horrible layout. A ton of wasted space. It's like they came up with this card in five minutes.


Upper Deck called. They thank you for stealing one of their really bad designs. Here's hoping 2015 Topps borrows from '95 Fleer.


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............

So what, in my opinion, works? Probably the one thing most people dislike.


When I saw the images, I thought these die cut minis would be dreadful. However, getting one in my hand (even if it's Donnie Baseball), these are really neat. It's a far better way to showcase probably the most over printed set ever by Topps than putting it in Archives or another product. Let's play arts and crafts here at 2x3 world.


The edge is a lot wider than the original '89's, plus a change in the logo and the window of the image below the ribbon, but otherwise it's a fun way to use that design as a mini with the shaping of the card. That being said, I'm still only collecting the old timers and White Sox minis.

So there's my final opinion on 2014. A big miss in my book. Feel free to have your own comments on my thoughts, but in the end I'm right, cuz it's my blog and what I say goes!

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

I ain't got no 2014

I didn't go to Walmart today. Nor Target. None of the big box stores that carry retail cards. I am sure the nearest Walmart to my house put out the '14 Topps today in one form or another. But I didn't head out to pick any up.

If you recall, I don't plan to go after building the 2014 set this year. I think the design is really poor and the inserts are getting too insane in the number of borders, subsets, diecuts, etc.... I saw the prelease look, then I saw the checklist, and it all confirmed I was thinking the right thing.

Many of the bloggers have found and posted cards, and I am right - I will not be going after the 2014 set. I may buy a pack here and there, just for the fix of ripping some wax cello plastic. But besides securing a White Sox team set, that's about all. I think the design and the photography (from what I have seen) is a step back from previous years.

That is not to say I don't need more than the Sox cards. I have seen some images, and folks, that is where you step in. You know of my throwback, bunting and double play binders - there are plenty of cards I will need from 2014 to fill the pages. Let me steal a few images from some fellow bloggers.


Nick at Dime Boxes posted these two. Can't say much about the ugliness of the softball uniforms on the left, but I am going to need both cards, and a 2nd of the Alexei for my Sox set.


The Junior Junkie went nuts with a bunch of rack packs. Gorgeous Cubs throwbacks are in Topps.


So are those A's unis too. I hope the Angels unis from that game are on another card.


Daddy need him some double play cardboard.

So I ask you, the reader, the shaping of the baseball collecting world - send me your unwanted doubles that fill my binder needs. Turn my dreams into realities.